AI is repricing document review.Your clients are the ones repricing it.
Taiso checks every extracted term against the document it came from — escalates only what it can't confirm to your reviewers, and ships each matter with an evidence pack your client's counsel can defend. Same reviewers. Every document covered.
You can't sample your way
out of an accuracy question.
This isn't a staffing problem you can fix with better people. It's a coverage problem — and coverage is an architecture decision, not an effort decision.
Watch every document get checked.
Not a sample.
A two-and-a-half-minute walkthrough of one hundred documents from a single matter — narrated by the reviewer who used to read all of them.
The ninety you didn't open are the ninety you still certify.
No reviewer re-reads a page.
The trail your client's counsel can defend.
Illustration of the mechanism on a hundred matter documents. Volumes and counts are illustrative, not measured results — the exception rate most of all. How many items actually need a person is the number the parallel run measures on your own work, and it is the number that decides whether the hours hold.
One hundred percent of the matter.
At the cost of your ten percent sample.
Taiso reads every document, checks each extracted term against the passage it came from, and routes only what it can't confirm to your reviewers. Their hours stop going into re-reading and start going into judgment.
Everything you didn't open, you still certify.
Same review hours. Every document systematically checked. The machine reads all of it; your reviewers decide the few it couldn't confirm — and every decision lands in the pack.
Start with Taiso Verify on a single workflow — no migration, and nothing new for your team to learn. Scale to the Taiso Agent Control Platform — your whole review operation, verified.
What your GC asks
before signing off on this.
On certification: SOC 2 Type I is on the clock, and Type II is what most financial buyers gate on — we are not going to pretend otherwise. Closed work is still confidential data, so the pilot runs under NDA and a DPA, in your environment or ours, and goes through the same security review your clients require of any new processor. We will fill in the questionnaire.
Five checks
on every extracted term.
Five checks, one verdict — ALLOW — before the term reaches your client's deliverable.
Your coverage today,
and the same hours under a gate.
Your sampling rate is the only number that changes. The reviewer hours do not.
The proof compounds.
The next matter starts ahead.
By day 3 you see what it would have caught on your own matter. By day 14 you have the evidence pack and the list of what your sample missed — yours to keep either way.
Where the margin goes
on a fixed-fee matter.
If two of these are true, the pilot below was built for you: one matter you have already closed, and nothing in production changes.
One closed matter.
Your own numbers.
Give us one matter you have already delivered, under NDA. We run it in parallel — your client never touches it, your production never changes — and we hand back what the pipeline caught, what your sample missed, and what we got wrong. Bounded defect rates with the sample size beside them, never a zero-miss promise.